Without a doubt the most useful part of
the AP Stylebook as far as
I'm concerned is the remarkably detailed, unequivocal grammar rules.
In so many cases, even the most advanced textbooks leave some room
for interpretation of fail to be truly decisive. The fact that this
book is wholly focused around a single specific style leaves no room
for ambiguity. Of course, languages evolve constantly to meet the
needs and behaviors of the cultures that create and utilize them.
That said, anyone with any hope of becoming a professional writer,
especially one with a focus on technical or journalistic writing, can
benefit greatly from a clear foundation on which he or she can rely.
There
are several that I've been inadvertently violating for a long time
and a few of which I was completely unaware. I've been misusing
serial commas, for example, operating under the assumption that the
second to last in a list also requires its own comma. I like to think
of myself as a fairly articulate individual, but the real intricacies
of any language are difficult for anyone to completely master, so
having a truly comprehensive guide is a tremendous asset.
This
was another example found in my workplace, on a piece of paperwork
relating to the linesets. The linesets are the counter-weighted ropes
connected to a series of metal pipes called battens suspended from
the ceiling on which “soft goods” (curtains, screens, etc.) are
hung. The key problem, however, is that they are installed in the
Austad AuDitorium,
not the Austad AuTitorium,
which sounds to me like a particularly grandiose gentleman's club.

The AP Stylebook is absolutely amazing! I can't get over it. I tried saying "autitorium" out loud and I can't imagine writing it that way. Good catch, thanks for sharing.
ReplyDelete