The eleventh rule to writing well is voice/style. Over
the summer I read nine books and I noticed that it was more the writing style
and the voice of the characters or the narrator that I liked. A story needs a
voice as much as it needs words. A story can sound great, but if the characters
don’t sound as they should, the story is falls apart. It isn’t the words that
make a story what it is. It doesn’t matter the if the voice is crazy and long-sentenced
like “A Clockwork Orange,” or a black humored, satiric voice like in “Slaughterhouse-Five.”
It is important that the characters have a unique voice that makes them worth
writing about.
“A Clockwork Orange,”
was a hard read because Anthony Burgess constantly uses run-on sentences like, “Our
pockets were full of deng, so there was no real need from the point of view of
crasting any more pretty polly to tolchock some old veck in an alley and viddy
him swim in his blood while we counted the takings and divided by four, nor to
do the ultra-violent on some shivering starry grey-haired ptitsa in a shop and
go smecking off with the till’s guts.” The voice of his book is complex and
long. He uses words that aren’t real and run-on sentences, but it is that crazy
voice that makes the book a classic.
In “Slaughterhouse-Five,” Kurt Vonnegut writes about a writer
writing a story about a man unstuck from time, who believes to have spent time
in an alien zoo. The narrator uses the story of Billy Pilgrim to tell his story
of the Dresden firebombing. Whenever someone dies the narrator says, “So it
goes.” But the narrator is writing the story and his voice stays consistent with
the coming unstuck of Billy Pilgrim. The voice of the narrator and Pilgrim
helps the reader really get into the story. If it wasn’t for a voice and the
writing style, the crazy story wouldn’t work.
Another book I read, “SteelHeart,” has one of the most
annoying characters in any book I have ever read. David is an okay character,
but he is constantly making bad metaphors. The character then has to explain
how what he said is a metaphor. This was annoying and Sanderson must have realized
this, because in the second book the metaphors disappear.
This week I got the text, “Hey everyone! So kinda last
minute but would anyone like to meet at chilis tonight (Christies choice) it’s for Christies
Birthday.” I responded with, “Yes, and it is Christy’s.” I don’t really mind
the “kinda” instead of “kind of,” but I hate when the possessive Y becomes ies
just because.
My friend on facebook is always trying and failing to use
periods and commas properly: “Having an anxiety
attack is like jumping into an ice covered pond, first when you hit the ice it hurts then when you hit the water
it's so cold you can't move or breathe and before you know you're trapped under
the surface gasping for air while your lungs fill with water.” She uses
commas instead of periods and then doesn’t use commas where she should. Her
thoughts end up being run-on, sometimes what seems like forever, sentences.
I like all your examples from novels because we usually don't consider the fact that published works can technically have grammatical or syntax errors. Authors often use 'creative license' and do things outside the rules. I think it's interesting to read novels that break rules by using a lot of fragments. I recently read a book where quotation marks were often omitted when characters spoke. While it threw me off at first, I came to appreciate it as creativity later on.
ReplyDelete