I am very fond of leads. I am the type of reader that wants
to know why this article is important to me within the first couple of
sentences. The headlines are also very important, but most of the time uninformative.
Here is the first lead example I found on USAToday.com.
I like that it tells you exactly what the article is in a
perfect summary. Notice they don’t name the three teens in the lead, nor do
they name the school or the outcome. This, to me, is a perfect example of what
a lead should be.
This next example I found confused me. I found it on KSL.com The title reads, “In
our opinion: U.S. District Judge David Nuffer’s ruled this week on Utah’s new
election law” and this is what was next:
So what I don’t understand about this article is the
different places my eye wants to go. Generally the lead is what I want to read first for the summary, however when you first look down
from the title, you see the picture and a caption. Naturally, I want to read
the caption, which is a type of summary. Then I look underneath the picture
where I find an actual “Summary.” When I finally read the lead I kind of
already know what’s going on because of the summary and caption. If I were just
to start with the lead, I wouldn’t finish reading the story because it’s not enticing, there's no informative information in it.
Grammar Fail – where
to start with this one? The possessive of “pump’s” and “card’s” or the
spelling of inconvenience “Inconvenius”? There should also be a period after “Thank You” and after "card's". "In side" is one word. "You're" should be Your. I'm not entirely sure why they capitalized every word It’s
all a train wreck.
. 
Is it not funny how people are becoming more prone to bad spelling as well as grammar because they are lazy. what i believe you are seeing in the article from KSL is what is called the nut-graph.
ReplyDeleteI am also the kind of reader that likes to know what the article is about, in the first few sentences! The summaries help me decide if I continue or not.
ReplyDeleteThe possessives as plurals is one of my greatest grammatical pet peeves. I've never understood it. How does that get confused in the minds of people who have been using this language for their entire lives?
ReplyDelete